What is the consequence of an officer broadcasting an attack?

When an officer broadcasts an attack, the primary consequence is that it alerts bystanders to help. This communication serves as a signal to those in the vicinity that there is an emergency situation. By making this information public, it can mobilize witnesses or other individuals who may be able to assist, whether it's by calling for additional assistance, providing immediate support, or creating a diversion that aids the officer in managing the situation.

In contrast, the other options address different aspects of communication or operational strategy that are less directly related to the immediate need for assistance. For example, standardizing communication protocols may be important for maintaining order and clarity during incidents, but it does not directly address the outcome of broadcasting an attack. Similarly, enabling a surprise counteraction and indicating an unsuccessful approach pertain to tactical considerations and assessments of the situation rather than the immediate benefit of alerting those who could help.